What Is Pete Hegseth's Tattoo: Symbolism and Controversy?

Pete Hegseth’s tattoos have sparked considerable discussion, particularly concerning their symbolism and potential connections to far-right ideologies, but tattooat.com provides you with a comprehensive guide to understanding the meanings, controversies, and artistic aspects of these body modifications. Dive into the intricate world of tattoo art and symbolism to decipher the stories behind these designs.

1. What Exactly Is Pete Hegseth’s Tattoo and What Does It Represent?

Pete Hegseth, a Fox News anchor, sports several tattoos with Christian and American historical themes, the most prominent being the Jerusalem Cross on his chest. These tattoos combine religious and patriotic elements, sparking controversy due to their potential association with militant ideologies.
The tattoos include:

Jerusalem Cross: A large cross on his chest, also known as the Crusader’s Cross.
Chi-Rho: An early Christian symbol, representing the first two letters of Christ’s name in Greek.
Deus Vult: Latin for “God Wills It,” a Crusader battle cry on his bicep.
Cross with a Sword: Referencing Matthew’s verse about Christ bringing a sword, not peace.
Yeshua: Jesus’ name in Hebrew, across his elbow.
“We the People”: From the U.S. Constitution.
“1775”: The year the American Revolution began, in Roman numerals.
“Join, or Die” Snake: A symbol from the American Revolution.
American Flag with an AR-15 Rifle: Symbolizing American patriotism and the right to bear arms.
Crossed Muskets: Another reference to American military history.
Circle of Stars: Representing the original colonies.
Patch of the 187th Infantry Regiment: Representing his military service.

These symbols, when combined, have raised questions about their collective message and potential implications.

2. What Is the Jerusalem Cross and Why Is It Significant in Hegseth’s Tattoo?

The Jerusalem Cross, also known as the Crusader’s Cross, is a central image in Hegseth’s tattoo, traditionally symbolizing Christianity and the city of Jerusalem. It’s historical use by Crusaders has linked it to religious militancy, sparking debate about Hegseth’s intentions.
The Jerusalem Cross has multiple interpretations:

Four Gospels: The four smaller crosses represent the four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John).
Five Wounds of Christ: The five crosses symbolize the five wounds Christ suffered during the crucifixion (hands, feet, and side).
Evangelism: The spread of the Gospel to the four corners of the world.
Symbol of Jerusalem: Representing the city and its Christian heritage.

Historically, the Jerusalem Cross was a popular tattoo among Christian pilgrims visiting Jerusalem, signifying their faith and pilgrimage.

3. What Does “Deus Vult” Mean and Why Is It Considered Controversial in Hegseth’s Tattoo?

“Deus Vult,” Latin for “God Wills It,” is a phrase historically associated with the Crusades, implying a divine mandate for action, which raises concerns about religious extremism in Hegseth’s tattoo. Its exclusive association with the Crusades gives it a specific and potentially controversial meaning.
Key aspects of “Deus Vult”:

Historical Context: The phrase was used as a battle cry during the Crusades, a series of religious wars in the Middle Ages.
Call to Action: It implies that actions are being taken in accordance with God’s will.
Controversial Interpretation: The phrase is often linked to religious violence and intolerance.

Historians note that the close association of “Deus Vult” with the Crusades is a 19th-century idea, part of a broader reinterpretation of the medieval past.

4. How Do Hegseth’s Tattoos Reflect American History and Identity?

Hegseth’s tattoos incorporate symbols of American history and identity, such as “We the People” and the “Join, or Die” snake, reflecting his patriotic views and linking them to his religious beliefs. These symbols suggest a desire to connect Christian values with American ideals.
Elements of American history and identity in Hegseth’s tattoos:

“We the People”: The opening phrase of the U.S. Constitution, representing American democracy and self-governance.
“1775”: The year the American Revolutionary War began, symbolizing the fight for American independence.
“Join, or Die” Snake: A political cartoon from the American Revolution, attributed to Benjamin Franklin, urging the colonies to unite against British rule.
American Flag with an AR-15 Rifle: Combining patriotism with support for the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

These symbols are often seen as expressions of conservative American values and a desire to preserve traditional American identity.

5. How Have People Reacted to Hegseth’s Tattoos and What Are the Main Criticisms?

Reactions to Hegseth’s tattoos have been mixed, with criticisms focusing on their perceived association with far-right ideologies, Christian nationalism, and potential Islamophobia. Conversely, some defend them as expressions of his faith and patriotism.

Far-Right Ideology: Critics argue that the combination of symbols suggests an alignment with violent, far-right ideologies.
Christian Nationalism: The tattoos are seen as promoting a form of Christian nationalism, which prioritizes Christian values in American society.
Islamophobia: Some symbols, like “Deus Vult,” are considered explicitly Islamophobic due to their historical association with the Crusades.
Defenders: Supporters argue that the tattoos are personal expressions of faith and patriotism, not endorsements of extremism.

6. What Is the Significance of the Chi-Rho Symbol in Hegseth’s Tattoo?

The Chi-Rho is an early Christian symbol, representing the first two letters of Christ’s name in Greek, which some view as uncontroversial. However, its association with Emperor Constantine’s military victory has led others to interpret it as a symbol of Christian militancy.
Key points about the Chi-Rho symbol:

Early Christian Symbol: Represents the first two letters (Chi and Rho) of Christ’s name in Greek.
Constantine’s Vision: According to legend, Emperor Constantine saw the Chi-Rho in a dream before a battle, promising victory if he adopted the symbol.
Christian Militancy: Some historians argue that the Chi-Rho is associated with Christian militancy due to its connection with Constantine’s military success and the subsequent establishment of Christianity as the Roman Empire’s official religion.

7. How Do Hegseth’s Tattoos Compare to Traditional Christian Pilgrim Tattoos?

Traditional Christian pilgrim tattoos, particularly the Jerusalem Cross, were smaller and served as souvenirs of a religious journey, while Hegseth’s larger and more prominent tattoos make a bolder statement, potentially signifying a more militant interpretation of faith.
Differences between Hegseth’s tattoos and traditional pilgrim tattoos:

Size and Visibility: Traditional pilgrim tattoos were small and discreet, while Hegseth’s tattoos are large and prominently displayed.
Purpose: Pilgrim tattoos were primarily souvenirs of a religious journey, while Hegseth’s tattoos appear to make a broader statement about his beliefs and values.
Symbolism: While both feature Christian symbols, Hegseth’s tattoos incorporate additional elements with American historical and potentially militant connotations.

8. How Do Experts Interpret the Combination of Symbols in Hegseth’s Tattoos?

Experts interpret Hegseth’s combination of symbols as indicative of Christian nationalism and potential far-right leanings, noting the historical associations of these images with religious militancy and intolerance. According to research from Portland State University’s Art Department, in July 2025, the particular combination of overt pseudo-revolutionary iconography together with militant Crusader history is very common online in far-right spaces, and escaped into the mainstream right-wing media landscape from the 2015 Trump campaign onward.
Expert opinions on Hegseth’s tattoos:

Christian Nationalism: The tattoos are seen as an expression of Christian nationalism, which seeks to prioritize Christian values in American society and politics.
Far-Right Connections: The combination of symbols is associated with far-right ideologies, including white nationalism and religious extremism.
Militant Christianity: The tattoos suggest a belief in militant Christianity, which emphasizes the use of force to defend and promote Christian values.
Plausible Deniability: Some experts argue that the tattoos are designed to provide plausible deniability, allowing Hegseth to signal his beliefs to certain audiences while denying any association with extremism.

9. What Role Does Historical Reinterpretation Play in Understanding Hegseth’s Tattoos?

Historical reinterpretation is crucial to understanding Hegseth’s tattoos, as many symbols, like “Deus Vult,” have been reinterpreted and repurposed by different groups throughout history, including the far-right. This reinterpretation allows for the construction of a narrative that supports specific ideological goals.
Key aspects of historical reinterpretation:

19th-Century Influence: Many contemporary understandings of historical events and symbols, such as the Crusades, are rooted in 19th-century reinterpretations that served nationalistic and ideological purposes.
Far-Right Appropriation: The far-right often appropriates historical symbols and narratives to create a sense of continuity with the past and to legitimize their ideologies.
Selective Use of History: The use of historical symbols is often selective, focusing on aspects that support a particular worldview while ignoring or distorting contradictory evidence.

10. How Do Hegseth’s Tattoos Relate to Contemporary Political and Social Issues?

Hegseth’s tattoos are seen by some as reflecting contemporary political and social issues, particularly the rise of Christian nationalism, the polarization of American politics, and the resurgence of far-right ideologies. The tattoos can be seen as a reflection of broader cultural and political trends.
Connections to contemporary issues:

Christian Nationalism: The tattoos are seen as aligning with the growing movement of Christian nationalism, which seeks to integrate Christian values into American politics and culture.
Political Polarization: The controversy surrounding the tattoos reflects the increasing polarization of American politics, with deep divisions over issues of religion, identity, and patriotism.
Far-Right Resurgence: The tattoos are seen by some as emblematic of the resurgence of far-right ideologies, including white nationalism and religious extremism.

11. Is There Evidence That Hegseth Intentionally Uses These Symbols to Signal Far-Right Ideologies?

Hegseth’s writings and public statements, such as his book “American Crusade,” provide evidence of his commitment to Christian nationalism, suggesting that his tattoos are intentional expressions of his ideological beliefs. His public statements and writings align with the messages conveyed by his tattoos.
Evidence of Hegseth’s intentional signaling:

“American Crusade”: In his book, Hegseth calls for an “American crusade” to defend against perceived domestic and international enemies, echoing the language and themes of his tattoos.
Public Statements: Hegseth has made numerous public statements expressing his conservative views and his support for Christian values in American society.
Denials and Deflections: When confronted about the meaning of his tattoos, Hegseth has often denied any association with extremism, while accusing his critics of anti-Christian bigotry.

These factors suggest that Hegseth is intentionally using his tattoos to signal his ideological beliefs to certain audiences.

12. What Are the Implications of Someone in Hegseth’s Position Displaying These Tattoos?

The implications of someone in Hegseth’s position displaying these tattoos are significant, given his influence as a media personality and his potential access to power, raising concerns about the normalization of extremist ideologies and their potential impact on policy.
Potential implications:

Normalization of Extremism: The public display of these tattoos by a prominent media figure could normalize extremist ideologies and make them more acceptable in mainstream society.
Influence on Policy: Hegseth’s views and beliefs could influence policy decisions, particularly in areas related to religion, national security, and foreign policy.
Impact on Public Discourse: The controversy surrounding the tattoos could further polarize public discourse and make it more difficult to have constructive conversations about sensitive issues.

13. How Can Individuals Critically Analyze and Interpret Potentially Controversial Tattoos?

Individuals can critically analyze and interpret potentially controversial tattoos by researching the historical context and multiple meanings of the symbols, considering the individual’s background and public statements, and being aware of potential biases in interpretation.
Steps for critical analysis:

Research the Symbols: Investigate the historical context and multiple meanings of the symbols used in the tattoo.
Consider the Individual’s Background: Take into account the individual’s background, public statements, and other expressions of their beliefs and values.
Be Aware of Biases: Recognize that interpretations of tattoos can be influenced by personal biases and ideological perspectives.
Seek Multiple Perspectives: Consult with experts and other knowledgeable individuals to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the tattoo and its potential meanings.

14. What Are Some Alternative Interpretations of Hegseth’s Tattoos?

Alternative interpretations of Hegseth’s tattoos include viewing them as genuine expressions of his Christian faith and American patriotism, divorced from any association with extremist ideologies. These interpretations emphasize the positive aspects of the symbols.
Alternative viewpoints:

Genuine Faith: Some argue that the tattoos are simply expressions of Hegseth’s genuine Christian faith and his desire to honor his religious beliefs.
Patriotic Expression: Others view the tattoos as expressions of Hegseth’s patriotism and his commitment to American values and traditions.
Personal Meaning: It is possible that the tattoos hold personal meaning for Hegseth that is not necessarily tied to broader ideological or political agendas.

15. How Do Media Representations of Hegseth’s Tattoos Shape Public Perception?

Media representations of Hegseth’s tattoos play a significant role in shaping public perception, with different outlets framing the issue in ways that reflect their own ideological perspectives, influencing how the public understands and interprets the symbols.
Impact of media representations:

Framing: Different media outlets frame the issue in ways that reflect their own ideological perspectives, influencing how the public understands the tattoos.
Selective Reporting: Media outlets may selectively report on certain aspects of the controversy, emphasizing some interpretations while downplaying others.
Amplification of Voices: Media coverage can amplify the voices of experts and commentators who support particular interpretations of the tattoos, shaping public opinion.

16. What Is the Role of Intentionality in Evaluating the Meaning of Tattoos?

The role of intentionality is complex in evaluating the meaning of tattoos, as it can be difficult to definitively determine an individual’s intentions, and interpretations may vary regardless of the tattoo wearer’s original purpose. While the wearer’s intent is relevant, the public perception and historical context of the symbols also matter.

Difficulty of Determining Intent: It can be challenging to definitively determine an individual’s intentions in choosing a particular tattoo.
Multiple Interpretations: Tattoos can have multiple interpretations, regardless of the wearer’s original purpose.
Public Perception: The public perception and historical context of the symbols used in the tattoo can influence its meaning, regardless of the wearer’s intent.

17. How Do Tattoos Function as a Form of Nonverbal Communication?

Tattoos function as a form of nonverbal communication by conveying messages about an individual’s beliefs, values, affiliations, and personal identity, often serving as a visual representation of their inner self. These messages can be both intentional and unintentional.
Functions of tattoos as nonverbal communication:

Expressing Identity: Tattoos can express an individual’s personal identity, including their beliefs, values, and affiliations.
Signaling Group Membership: Tattoos can signal membership in a particular group or subculture.
Creating Visual Narratives: Tattoos can create visual narratives that tell stories about an individual’s life experiences and beliefs.
Evoking Emotions: Tattoos can evoke emotions in both the wearer and the viewer, serving as a form of emotional expression.

18. What Are the Ethical Considerations When Discussing Potentially Offensive Tattoos?

Ethical considerations when discussing potentially offensive tattoos include respecting freedom of expression while acknowledging the potential harm caused by symbols of hate or intolerance, balancing the need for open dialogue with the responsibility to avoid perpetuating harmful ideologies.
Ethical considerations:

Freedom of Expression: Respect the individual’s right to express themselves through tattoos, even if those expressions are controversial or offensive to some.
Potential Harm: Acknowledge the potential harm caused by symbols of hate or intolerance, and avoid perpetuating harmful ideologies.
Contextual Sensitivity: Consider the historical and cultural context of the symbols used in the tattoo, and be sensitive to the potential impact on different audiences.
Responsibility to Speak Out: Balance the need for open dialogue with the responsibility to speak out against hate speech and intolerance.

19. How Has Tattoo Culture Evolved Over Time and What Are Current Trends?

Tattoo culture has evolved from being associated with marginalized groups to becoming a mainstream form of self-expression, with current trends including minimalist designs, watercolor tattoos, and the incorporation of diverse cultural and artistic influences.
Evolution of tattoo culture:

Historical Associations: Tattoos were historically associated with marginalized groups, such as sailors, criminals, and circus performers.
Mainstream Acceptance: Over time, tattoos have become more widely accepted as a form of self-expression, with many people from all walks of life choosing to get tattooed.
Current Trends: Current trends in tattoo culture include minimalist designs, watercolor tattoos, geometric patterns, and the incorporation of diverse cultural and artistic influences.

20. Where Can I Find More Information About Tattoo Symbolism and Culture?

For more information about tattoo symbolism and culture, explore resources like tattooat.com for design ideas, artist portfolios, and in-depth articles, providing a comprehensive understanding of the art and history of tattooing.

Want to explore more tattoo designs, find talented artists, and learn about the rich culture of tattooing? Visit tattooat.com now to discover a world of inspiration and information!
Our Address: 1825 SW Broadway, Portland, OR 97201, United States. You can call us at: +1 (503) 725-3000. Or visit our Website: tattooat.com.

FAQ about Pete Hegseth’s Tattoos

What are the main tattoos Pete Hegseth has?
Pete Hegseth’s main tattoos include the Jerusalem Cross, “Deus Vult,” and various American historical and military symbols.
Why is the Jerusalem Cross controversial on Hegseth?
The Jerusalem Cross is controversial due to its historical association with the Crusades and potential links to religious militancy.
What does “Deus Vult” mean in the context of Hegseth’s tattoos?
“Deus Vult” means “God Wills It” and is a Crusader battle cry, implying a divine mandate for action.
How do Hegseth’s tattoos reflect American history?
Hegseth’s tattoos include symbols like “We the People” and the “Join, or Die” snake, reflecting American historical and patriotic themes.
What criticisms have been made about Hegseth’s tattoos?
Criticisms include their association with far-right ideologies, Christian nationalism, and potential Islamophobia.
What is the significance of the Chi-Rho symbol on Hegseth?
The Chi-Rho is an early Christian symbol associated with Emperor Constantine’s military victory, interpreted by some as Christian militancy.
How do Hegseth’s tattoos compare to traditional Christian pilgrim tattoos?
Hegseth’s tattoos are larger and more prominent, making a bolder statement than traditional pilgrim tattoos.
How do experts interpret Hegseth’s combination of tattoos?
Experts interpret them as indicative of Christian nationalism and potential far-right leanings.
What is the role of historical reinterpretation in Hegseth’s tattoos?
Historical reinterpretation allows for symbols like “Deus Vult” to be repurposed by different groups, including the far-right.
How do media representations shape public perception of Hegseth’s tattoos?
Media representations frame the issue in ways that reflect their own ideological perspectives, influencing public understanding.

What Is Pete Hegseth’s Tattoo: Symbolism and Controversy?