A Houston woman is speaking out after what she describes as a harrowing experience with a tattoo that allegedly led to a severe infection requiring surgery. Alisa Hatch claims that a visit to Dago’s Tattoos on the North Freeway resulted in a painful infection, while the studio refutes the accusations, citing proper procedures and questioning her aftercare.
Hatch, who already had a tiger tattoo, decided to get it colored in at Dago’s Tattoos, a long-standing establishment known for its budget-friendly pricing and $1 piercings. She stated that the session on November 27th quickly became unbearable. According to Hatch, the artist outlined her existing tattoo in black ink and then again in color, causing significant discomfort.
“I had to keep having him stop because it was very painful,” Hatch explained, “and I wasn’t even able to put my leg down on the ground and stuff because it was hurting and throbbing so bad.”
The situation worsened overnight. Hatch reported that by the next day, she was unable to walk. Medical examination revealed cellulitis, a bacterial skin infection. She is currently undergoing treatment with three antibiotics and is scheduled for minor surgery to address the infection. Hatch firmly believes the infection originated from the coloring session at Dago’s Tattoos, suggesting the artist may have penetrated her skin too deeply with the needle.
However, Dago Coelho, the owner of Dago’s Tattoos, vehemently denies any fault on the part of his studio. He emphasizes the extensive experience of his artists, some of whom have been with him for two decades. “People have been with me for 20 years. They’re not just new kids in and out of here,” Coelho stated, defending the professionalism of his team.
Coelho also presented a signed waiver from Hatch, acknowledging the studio’s use of sterile needles and tubes. “The procedures we do here we do through the health department of rules and regulations,” he asserted, highlighting their adherence to safety protocols.
Furthermore, Coelho suggested that the issue might stem from Hatch’s initial tattoo, which was done by a different artist at her home. He also pointed to Hatch’s refusal of their recommended post-tattoo care ointment, evidenced by her signature on a refusal form. “We offered her tattoo solution to put on your tattoo while it’s healing. She refused that. She signed she did not want the tattoo solution,” Dago explained.
Despite the studio’s claims, Hatch maintains that she is experienced with tattoos, this being her 18th, and knows how to properly care for them. “I have numerous tattoos and I know how to take care of a tattoo. I’ve never had this issue,” she countered.
Seeking recourse, Hatch has enlisted legal representation from the Gonzalez Law Group. She aims to share her story publicly to warn others about potential risks and complications associated with tattoos, especially concerning infection and aftercare. The case highlights the importance of choosing reputable tattoo studios like Dago’s Tattoo and diligently following aftercare instructions, while also raising questions about responsibility when infections occur.
